Sunday, January 22, 2012
I was reading my regular list of blogs this morning, and came across this post from one of my favourites. A couple more clicks and I was looking at a challenge from Jill Stanek. Considering this play on words is something that I've always found incredibly intriguing...I'm taking the challenge.
I have to admit, the pro-abortion side has an incredible knack for taking very positive words (like "choice" for example) and using them to mask the evils of what they are doing. I mean, come on, who wouldn't be all for giving a choice? We, as very individualistic Americans LOVE to have choices and free reign over all of them.
But what if the choice is to participate in murder? That's what it means in this whole abortion situation, does it not? After all, that's what abortion is, isn't it? The ending of a life of a child?
I can see why they had to replace "killing your child" with "choice.".....they just don't quite have the same ring to them....
So....I ask, if you are pro-choice - define CHOICE.
What is the CHOICE you speak of? The choice to do WHAT? The choice to have WHAT? A choice implies that you have to pick between two items/actions/um, things. What is this CHOICE you are advocating for?
To be continued......
Posted by Frank Smith at 7:03 AM